Physician Antiretaliation, Due Process, and Indemnification Rights

Year: 2023

Resolution Number: 16

Action Taken: Approved

Status: In Progress

Author(s): Leah Davis, DO

Sponsor: David Whalen, MD

On behalf of: Grand Traverse-Leelanau-Benzie County Delegation

Committee: B (Legislation)

Resolved Section(s):
RESOLVED: That MSMS (1) continue to assess the needs of employed physicians, ensuring autonomy in clinical decision-making and self-governance; (2) promote physician collaboration, teamwork, partnership, and leadership in emerging health care organizational structures, including but not limited to hospitals, health care systems, medical groups, insurance company networks and accountable care organizations, in order to assure and be accountable for the delivery of quality health care; (3) advocate for the rights of physicians against employer retaliation, including unfair or discriminatory termination of employment or contractual obligation for conscious objection and/or conscious refusal to participate in any activity that the physician judges to be unethical or unsafe for patients; and (4) advocate for the physician’s authority to practice medicine based on medical judgment, conscience, ethics, morals, or good faith obligation toward patients to a non-physician or corporate entity; and be it furtherRESOLVED: That MSMS adopt policy and advocate (1) to ensure physicians on staff receive written notification when their license is being used to document supervision of non-physician practitioners; (2) that physician supervision should be explicitly defined and mutually agreed upon; (3) that advanced notice and disclosure be provided to physicians before they are hired or as soon as practicably known by provider organizations and institutions that anticipate physician supervision of non-physician practitioners as a condition for physician employment; (4) that organizations, institutions, and medical staffs that have physicians who participate in supervisory duties for non-physician practitioners have processes and procedures in place that have been developed with appropriate clinical physician input; (5) that physicians have the right to object to or refuse to allow their license to be used to document supervision of non-physician practitioners without fear of retaliation; (6) that physicians be able to report professional concerns about care provided by the non-physician practitioners to the appropriate leadership with protections against retaliation; and (7) should be indemnified at the organizations’ and institutions’ expense from malpractice claims and other litigation arising out of the supervision function.

Fiscal Note: $12,000-$24,000

Resolution: View PDF for Physician Antiretaliation, Due Process, and Indemnification Rights

For More Information, Contact:

Stacey Hettiger , Director
Health Care Delivery
517-336-5732
shettiger@msms.org