Following this week's election results, significant shifts have occurred at the state level, affecting both legislative and judicial branches. In the State House, Republicans regained the majority with a 58-52 split, ending the Democratic trifecta and ushering in an era of divided government. This new balance could encourage bipartisan negotiations, as advancing legislation will now require support across party lines. Such a structure may allow Republicans to curb or stall any controversial bills they view as problematic. Notably, 96% of MDPAC-endorsed candidates won their races.

As we move into the lame-duck session, there are anticipated challenges, particularly on issues like medical malpractice reform. Given the current composition of the House, any Democratic-led initiative would need full caucus support, which could be challenging to secure. Republican Leader Matt Hall, anticipated to assume the role of Speaker, is expected to enforce party unity on critical votes, making it difficult for Democrats to pass substantial legislation without concessions.

On the judicial side, the State Supreme Court saw a decisive shift, with Democratic-nominated candidates Kyra Harris Bolden and Kimberly Ann Thomas winning both contested seats. Their victories expand the progressive majority to 5-2, which could shape the court's approach to key legal questions, especially concerning liability laws. Stakeholders such as MSMS are expected to monitor closely for any judicial challenges to existing liability statutes under this new majority.

Nationally, the presidential race concluded with former President Donald Trump regaining the presidency, achieving a clearer victory than many had forecasted. While polling in several swing states suggested tight races, Trump managed to secure most of these critical states, ultimately bringing them into his column.

The Senate was called for the Republicans, and although the House remains technically undecided, it is widely expected to stay under Republican control.